After thinking about this very much lately I've been questioning the way this all took place. There are many theories that can be thought up, but most stick to only a few. Each one has its reasoning, however each one also has its faults, and each one can also be proven wrong. By one fact, by two, it doesn't matter, no one will fully believe someone if they can't prove themself fully. I appreciate all of the opinions which have been introduced over the years, since that illustrious day of July 20th, 1969. Now I have been trying to uncover the mystery of all of this, but nothing seems to come up to make full sense. So to recap all of the main ideas (and maybe debunk them a little) should help come up with something else.
The most popular contribution to the moon landings is the following believing it. The video tapes and pictures is all that they needed to believe these "landings" on the moon. Now video tape and photos are incredible evidence, but in this case, they were done so foolishly that its hard to believe anyone can believe these photos. Now most people may know these but keep with it there may just be one your not so familier with. One of the most renowned "mistakes" if you will is that in one of the pictures you can blatantly see writing on one of the "moon rocks", it is a serial number all I remember is that it says "C -". Moving on, the next thing is that in one of the pictures you will see a rod sticking out of the vehicle (that they drove I assume), the odd thing is that that crosshairs, which are black appear to be behind the "rod" when they should be infront of it. Seems like a stupid mistake made when they may have altered the pictures to look more believable, after all, whos going to believe amazing quality pictures were taken on the moon? Other oddities that are seen in the picture are the lighting, after the photos were examined by David Percy, he claimed that the light in the pictures could only come from a studio. Also, there is the lack of scorch marks and a crater underneath the lunar module. Yet another is the shadows. In one photo Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin's shadow is much longer than the one of Neil Armstrong, when the only light comes from the sun. One more note is that the film on that they would have used would have gone through going to one extreme of temperature to the other and it is not unbelievable that it would have been impossible to load the film, which would have been fused into sticky morass.
Getting into the great belief that everything about it was faked much of the information proving this is in the above paragraph. So now I will make an attempt at proving this one false. Now one more piece of evidence that was used to throw off the moon landing is the lack of stars. Now according to Maria Blyzinsky, Curator of Astronomy at Greenwich Observatory in London the minimal amount of atmosphere should have made the stars very visable. However, NASA claimed that the sun was so bright that it blocked out the light of the stars. No one has had a comment to that from what I know. About the only truth I can say to throw this off is also a very extremely amazing piece of evidence, and that is the 340kg piece of radioactive moon rock with NASA proudly displayed for the public. Geologists found less silica and aluminum, and significantly more magnesium, iron and titanium than they would find in rocks from earth. Which left them in no doubt that these samples came from an extraterestrial source.
Now what people might not have thought about is that possibly the pictures were faked, but the moon landing did take place. I'm sure this will be argued for years to come. Hopefully, in the future there will be more evidence that proves or debunks this great conspiracy. For now you can believe what you want. Either that it is a hoax, or that it is an amazing achievement in the nature of mankind.